INDICATION OF PRODUCTION AND NON-PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS IN RURAL LANDSCAPE

Jan Váchal; Jarmila Straková; Petra Pártlová; Tsolmon Jambal

doi:10.24040/actaem.2018.20.2.30-40

Authors

Jan Váchal Department of Management, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
Jarmila Straková Department of Management, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
Petra Pártlová Department of Management, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
Tsolmon Jambal Department of Management, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24040/actaem.2018.20.2.30-40

Keywords:

production function, non-production function, rural area, harmonization of functions

Abstract

Stable landscape is a goal of every human civilization, however, at the current stage of development this task is becoming ever more urgent with regard to intense development of technological structures and their negative impact on cultural landscape. This involves a relevant definition of the scope of the non-production function. At the same time, it is desirable to have a quality production background for small and medium enterprises that represent 90 % of businesses in rural areas. This paper deals with those issues and some of the applied methods are original. This paper proposes one of the potential approaches that can ensure harmonization of the production a non-production functions. We assume that this approach will lead to an increase of the volume of the overall production generated by the given territory while minimizing the costs.

References

Arriba, B. R. 2009. Globalization, economic policy and rural development in Europe. Romanian journal of political science, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 3-13. http://www.sar.org.ro/polsci/?p=156

Ambronini, V., Bowman, C. 2009. What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management? International Journal of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 29-49. ISSN 1460 8545. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x

Augier, M., Teece, D.J. 2006. Understanding complex organization: the role of know-how, internal structure, and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 395-416. DOI: doi:10.1093/icc/dtl005

Bridge, S., O´Bridge, S., O´Neill, K, Cromie, S. 1998. Understanding Enterprise, Entrepreneurship & Small Business. London: Macmillan, 1998, 320 p. ISBN 0-3336 8348-X.

Cousins, S. A. O. 2001. Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 16, pp. 41–54.

Demo, M., Bielek, P. 2000. Regulačné technológie v produkčnom procese poľnohospodárskych plodín. Nitra: Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita v Nitre, 2000, 647 p. ISBN 8071377325, 9788071377320.

Fjellstad, W. J., Dramstad, W. E. 1999. Patterns of change in two contrasting Norwegian agricultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 45, pp. 177–191.

García-Ruiz, J. M., Lansata, T., Ruiz-Flano, P., Ortigosa, L., White, S., Gonzáles, C., Martí, C. 1996. Land use changes and sustainable development in mountain areas: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 267-277. ISSN 0921 2973.

Hamplová, E., Provazníková, K. 2015. Opinion and Attitudes of Entrepreneurs of Small and Medium-Sized Business in the Czech Republic Conditions. Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol. 23, pp. 942-947. ISSN 2212-8271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00438-4

Havlíček, K., Kašík, M. 2005. Marketingové řízení malých a středních podniků. Praha: Management Press. 172 p. ISBN 80-7261-120-8.

Helfat, C.F. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden: Blackwell. 160 p. ISBN 978-1-4051-3575-7.

Hribik, J. 2010. Vývoj malého a středního podnikání v České republice a Evropské unii. In National and Regional Economics VIII. Herlany, Slovak Republic: Technical University of Košice, pp. 362-371. ISBN 978-80-553-0517-2.

Ihse, M. 1995. Swedish agricultural landscapes– patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 41, No. 1–3, pp 21–37. ISSN 0169-2046.

Jongman, R. H. G. (ed.) et al. 1995. Ecological and landscape consequences of land cover change in Europe. Proceedings of the first ECNC on land cover chmate and its ecological consequences, 16-18 February, Tilburg.

Kuuluvainen, A. 2011. Dynamic capabilities in the International Growth of Small and Medium-Sized Firms (PhD-Thesis, Turku School of Economics), 262 p. ISBN 978-952-249-175-9. Avaliable in: https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/113653/Ae4_2011.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Learned, E.P. 1965. Business policy: text and cases. In R D Irwin, R. D., Lundstrom, A., Stevenson, L.S.A (ed.): Entrepreneurship Policy. Theory and Practice. New York: Springer, 2005, 310 p.

Lipský, Z. 1995. The changing face of the Czech rural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 39-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)01034-6

Mander, U., Palang, H., Ihse, M. 2004. Development of European landscapes. Landscape end Urban Planning, Vol. 67, No. 1–8. Editorial. ISBN 0-387-24140-X.

Marsden, T., Sonnino, R., 2008. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 422-431. ISSN 0743 0167. DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001

Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Meyer, A.D. 2008. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press. 304 p. ISBN 978-0804748407.

Moreira, F., Rego, F.C., Fereira, P.G. 2001. Temporal (1958-1995) patterns of changes in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal: implications for fire occurrence. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 16, pp. 557-567.

Naveh, Z., Liebermann, A.S. 1994. Landscape ecology: Theory and Application. New York: Springer – Verlag, 1994. s. 360.

Němec, J. 2001. Bonitace a oceňování zemědělské půdy České republiky. Praha: Výzkumný ústav zemědělské ekonomiky. ISBN 80-85898-90-X.

Olsson, E.G.A., Austrheim, G., Grenne, N. 2000. Landscape pattern in mountains, land use and environmental diversity, Mid-Norway 1960-1993. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 15, pp. 155-170.

Straková, J. 2017. Analýza vybraných faktorů vnějšího prostředí na stabilitu malých a středních podniků v ČR. Mladá veda, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 124-133. ISSN 1339-3189.

Storey, D.J. 1994. Understanding the small business sector. International Thomson Business Press, pp. 355. ISBN 9781861523815.

Sýkora, J. 1998. Venkovský prostor I. Praha: Vydavatelství ČVUT. 62 p.

Šebestová, J., Wagnerová, E. 2007. Analysis of endogenous factors influencing small and medium sized enterprises: The case of the Moravian-Silesian region. Ekonomický časopis, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 411-424.

Teece, D.J. 2012. Strategy, Innovation and the Theory of the Firm. Edward Elgar Publishing, 492 p. ISBN 978 1 84980 864 4.

Váchal, J. 2000. Metoda postupné projekce ekologických systémů hospodaření (JU ZF Czech Budějovice, Habilitační práce), 152 p.

Váchal, J. et al. 2002. Methodology of the anthropoecological stabilization of landscape. In BTU Cottbus, Germany, pp. 143-150.

Van der Ploeg, J.D., Renting, H., Brunory, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden,T., De Rost, K., Sevilla-Guzmán, E., Ventura, F. 2000. Rural Development: from Practices and Policies towards Theory. Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 391-408. ISSN 0038-0199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00156

Vojík, V. 2009. Podnikání malých a středních podniků na jednotném trhu EU. Praha: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 978-80-7357-467-3.

INDICATION OF PRODUCTION AND NON-PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS IN RURAL LANDSCAPE

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License